Angelina Jolie, it has been reported, has decided to adopt a Middle-Eastern child, but it appears that she plans to do this on here own, and without her man, Brad Pitt. If you want to speculate you can, but honestly I don’t care if he doesn’t want another adopted kid, or whatever it is you want to come up with. THEY DON’T TAKE CARE OF THESE KIDS ANYWAYS.

It is a good thing that celebs try to adopt a lot of kids though I guess. Even if you don’t like celebs and think they make too much money (you are a moron if you don’t understand the money they bring in to those who hire them), you can’t argue that rich people adopting kids with little hope of a better life is a bad thing. If you were adopted by a celeb as a kid it would be pretty damn awesome wouldn’t it? You would never have to work at a place like a call center services the rest of your life. You’d be a spoiled brat.

She also talked a bit aobut her kids, of course. She was asked about what films her kids were allowed to watch and this was how she finally revealed that they fell in love on the Mr. & Mrs. Smith set.

During a discussion over which of her films she lets the couple’s children see, Jolie told the New York Times, so far it’s just “Kung-Fu Panda,” but she noted she looked forward to the day when the kids can watch 2005’s “Mr. & Mrs. Smith.”

“Not a lot of people get to see a movie where their parents fell in love,” Jolie said in article running in the Arts & Leisure section of the paper this Sunday.

While till more she worried about what her kids were going to find about her on the internet eventually. “Sexy pictures” and such. I’d worry too if I were her. She was pretty wild for quite a while…lol

I suppose we all were, but at least we aren’t all over the internet with it, or on film. Maybe the worst that could happen is that you posed for some pictures in a before and after for a Lipodrene commercial of some sort.

n an interview on NBC’s “Today” show on Thursday, the actress, whose twins Vivienne and Knox are 3 1/2 months old, nodded affirmatively when Matt Lauer asked if she and Pitt were going to adopt soon, but noted, “You can’t even start the process until any new children are six months old, to understand how the new family has settled.”

The other “Brangelina” kids are: Maddox (6), Pax (4), Zahara (3), and Shiloh (2).

Unbelievable. Really I can’t even comprehend this. The twin babydolls are supposedly looking at a $10 Million jackpot when they are born.

With two babies reportedly on the way, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt could also see a massive payday coming to them.

The New York Post reports that the figure for exclusive first photos of the Brangelina twins could hit the $10 million mark, far eclipsing the recent jackpot for Jennifer Lopez, which PEOPLE reportedly paid $6 million for.

Wow…and you wonder why media folks are so damned annoying. This is so high that people are going to be killing each other to get this photo. And you thought that broke ass welfare people were popping kids out for money. For $5 Mil a piece you could just hire a nanny and pump these kids out left and right.

For once a positive story in the world of Celeb fanaticism. Brad Pitt, and Angelina “The definition of sexy” Jolie, have been found to have donated over $8 Million to charity in the last year according to tax filings. Pitt, has also shown to have raised over $5 Million for his Make It Right Foundation.

That’s great and all, but now is time for a rant. That is Celebrity and Athlete Foundations. Yup…I am not in favor of them and now I am going to tell you why. Let’s suppose that there is an organization already established to research AIDS (There are a few) that have already set up an administration, a board, and all other aspects of a charitable organization. Now someone like…welll…Brad Pitt sets up an organization to also collect money for AIDS research. Let’s think about this a minute. There is already an organization that is not only staffed, but has the infrastructure to collect donations, but a celebrity or athlete sets one up anyways instead of just promoting the already existing charity.

Why would they do this? First of all, there are going to be more costs associated with the new organization that are already accounted for with the existing one. They will need to staff the foundation, set up the administrative duties, buy Duralee fabrics for decorative purchases of their buildings, and any other expenses they may incur. All the while eating into the donations that Average Joe made because they really like Brad Pitt. Instead of promoting an existing organization they start their own and eat into a much greater portion of donations to pay for a ton of unnecessary expenses. JUST PROMOTE THE EXISTING CHARITY.

So what is the motivation? I’m sure that many do it because they care. That’s great. Do some good deeds. On the other hand you have to believe that many of them do it not only for a nice pat on the back from society, but because of the many tax advantages such an organization offers them. I ask is this cause is so important, then why exactly are you going to eat into donations by setting up a completely new foundation? You don’t. You promote an existing one where the people running it are experienced in charity work already. Of course you won’t get nice plaques for your charitable work, and extra media coverage for this, so if your motivation is just tax write offs and recognition, then by all means waste as much of the hard working man’s money as you can on BS expenses because they don’t know any better.

*cough* sorry…just had to get that off my chest.