At last the Harry Potter movie version of the stories have finished. Early reviews seem to love the film. Why not? It was probably action packed all the way through considering what was left to cover.
I’ll just preface by saying that I have read the books quite a few times. Well…listened to Stephen Frye read them to me on my iPod as I did other things several times which is like listening to a play. If you are a fan of the books I can’t recommend the audiobooks with Frye reading highly enough. His ability to voice every character is astounding, and I think he does better with the material than anything else that has been released.
I have also seen all the movies. Except for DH2. As many of you that read the books have found the movies are I guess you could say HP-lite. There just isn’t enough time to cover everything in the movies that are in the books. So we have to give them some leeway in that regard. To me as someone that has read the books a few times the movies just feel insanely rushed and a lot of the moments that were my favorites were omitted, or changed in the films. Dobby=Neville being one of the major turns I wasn’t in favor of.
That doesn’t mean the movies are bad, but they do feel a bit light in content. Things move along so fast, but I think the characters and the actors selected in all the films are very good. Harry, Ron, and Hermione have basically sunk into my mind while reading the books as the characters. Dumbeldore of the movies I consider a bit off, however. He’s too stern and serious in the movies, while in the books he is quite comical to goofy, and much more laid back. Completely different than the films, which I find to be a bad interpretation.
Films have a very good dark feel to them, and a lot of cool magic effects. Acting is average I guess, but the dialog is a bit meh. Really it all comes down to time available to the movies and they characters aren’t as fleshed out as the books. I know a lot of people say the books are full of filler, but they are a tremendous story of character development for the main characters. Something the movies can’t possibly stick with. We have to get a lot of info out in little time. Condensing 10 hours, or 20+ in the longer books of material into 2 hours just isn’t possible. The films are still OK, but as films I don’t necessarily see them as “great”.
The films themselves are a bit too cheeseball at times and the dialogue is just out of context at times, or plain odd. The script is basically the most low end of the movies I’d have to say. They look great, but the stories and dialogue leave a lot to be desired for me as a movie. These are more or less big budget movies with big budget dumbed down dialogue IMO. Overall as movies they are average to good. Something like a 6-7/10 based solely on being a movie.
Deathly Hallows 1 I didn’t expect much out of. The first half of the book moves rather slow so I figured the movie would be pretty slow paced and it was. That just meant that Part 2 would be an action packed finish.
According to most of the reviews I have read fans are happy with it. Of course they are. It’s an action film totally I would guess compared to Part 1. Meaningless I know because “HP fans” doesn’t distinguish between fans that have a “read the books” plaques, and people that have only seen the movies.
We don’t need to read reviews of this if we are HP fans, however. We are either going to watch it, or we won’t. Part 1 I wanted to stop watching when Harry and Hermione decided to have a dance together which was ridiculous.
Reviews I don’t want to read because I hear nonsense like this:
Justin Chang for Variety “surges ahead with tremendous urgency, superb spectacle and powerful, even overwhelming emotion, only to falter with a hasty sendoff that seems to buckle under the weight of audience expectations. Tears will be shed as fans bid farewell to Hogwarts, but catharsis remains just out of reach.”
“perhaps the greatest triumph of this final film is its ability to overcome the deficiencies of J. K. Rowling’s writing.” He adds, “But Yates here transmutes it into a genuinely terrifying spectacle, as bloodied students fight desperately against a horde of screaming black-robed Death Eaters.”
Now she may not be the greatest writer ever, but this is the kind of thing that bugs me about critics of the books. Their lack of patience and ability to see the importance of the character development that the books hold. They call it filler, while I find most of these moments to be some of the best of the books. The movies are the Cliff’s Notes of the books, and even less detailed than that.
they can both be good in their own ways. The books to me are infinitely better as most of the time they are, but the movies aren’t “great” movies to me either. Less to do with the content too. It’s that they are just a rush of information and poor dialogue with a lot of pretty magical effects. I want more from a movie than that.